課程資訊
課程名稱
空間的政治經濟學
Political Economy of Space 
開課學期
104-1 
授課對象
工學院  建築與城鄉研究所  
授課教師
王志弘 
課號
BP7116 
課程識別碼
544 M4150 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期四A,B,C(18:25~21:05) 
上課地點
工綜305 
備註
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:25人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1041BP7116_pe 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

Henri Lefebvre說:「如果未曾生產一個合適的空間,那麼『改變生活方式』、『改變社會』等都是空話」。Lefebvre的警語,對於強調空間與環境規劃及設計做為一種介入性和轉化性實踐的學門而言,可說是十分受用,確認了社會轉變或改造必須考量根本的空間面向。然而,在能夠改造空間和社會之前,必須先分析社會/空間(空間性)的運作邏輯。就此,空間的政治經濟學分析,尤其是其中深受馬克思主義影響的流派,誠如Lefebvre開啟的典範所示,實為吾人不能不探討和運用的分析利器。

本課程為接續本所必修課「空間的社會分析」的進階課程,概述空間政治經濟分析的重要課題和分析概念,包括以下主題:資本主義與不均地理發展、資本主義危機與時空修補、空間分工、階級形構與階級鬥爭、地緣政治、市場、金融化與商品循環、空間治理與尺度政治、縉紳化、新自由主義都市化,以及空間抵抗與空間正義等,涵蓋了資本邏輯、產業動態、國家力量、社會鬥爭及未來願景等不同層面。
 

課程目標
本課程旨在提供修習者馬克思主義空間分析的基本視野,透過研讀重要學者的著作,習得有助於分析的概念,知悉相關爭論,並藉此釐清面對公共議題時的批判性立場及倫理關切。換言之,這門課的目標不僅在於學習知識與分析工具,也涉及了政治和倫理方面的討論。 
課程要求
■課程要求:
盡力閱讀課程材料,勇於發問,勤於出席。修習者的投入與表現,對本課程能否順利運作非常重要。本課程採取講演和討論課(seminar)並行方式,每次上課由教師講授和提示重點,並由參與者分配導讀該週的閱讀材料,每篇文章報告時間,必須控制於十五分鐘,盡量留時間發問和討論,探討能跟理論概念對話的經驗議題。報告者必須分發書面提要(必須包含三百字以內之摘述,主要論點和論證邏輯之說明【配合論證圖示】,以及評論和問題)。
沒有分配到當週閱讀材料導讀的同學,則需繳交針對某一篇或全部閱讀材料的讀書心得和提問,至少一頁。旁聽的同學,不需分配閱讀材料的導讀,也不必繳交作業,但是必須每堂課繳交讀書心得和提問。
本課程的設計份量,需要修課者在課堂外花費四倍以上的時間,也就是3 X 4=12個小時,包括閱讀教材、與同學討論、撰寫摘要或讀書心得及提問的時間。
■摘要寫作要點:
書面摘要必須於首頁列明報告文獻(APA格式)、日期、報告人,先有三百字摘要,述明整篇文章的問題意識和主要論點。然後是經過消化的、條理分明的內容概述。換言之,不宜逐段摘譯,最好是整理出文中討論的主要問題,以及作者對這些問題的回答或爭辯,建議以圖表方式整理出主要的論證架構,也可以搭配一些圖片,譬如說作者照片、書影或文中提到的人物和事件圖片。如果直接引述文中語句或段落,必須以不同字體清楚標示,並加註頁碼。最後,必須針對文獻內容提出問題,或是可供延伸討論的經驗議題。

各項報告須準時繳交,逾期不候。繳交時間明定於各周進度中。 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀

各週主題與進度
□閱讀材料份量將視修課人數與狀況彈性調整。部分閱讀材料(有*號者)將放在課程網頁上,其餘材料請自行準備。

第一講 課程介紹:空間的政治經濟分析 9/17
□研讀材料
1.Brenner, Neil and Christian Schmid (2015) “Towards a new epistemology of the urban?”, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 19(2/3): 151-182.*【必讀】
2.McCarthy, James (2009) “Marxist geography”, in Derek Gregory et al. (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography (pp. 446-448). Oxford: Blackwell.(有舊版中譯,收於《人文地理學詞典》,北京:商務印書館。)
3.Peet, Richard (2005)〈基進地理學、馬克思主義與馬克思主義地理學〉,《現代地理思想》(王志弘等譯)(pp. 105-176),台北:群學。(原書出版於1999年)
4.Peet, Richard and Nigel Thrift (1989) “Political economy and human geography”, in Richard Peet and Nigel Thrift (eds.), New Models in Geography: The Political-economy Perspective (pp. 3-29). London: Unwin Hyman.(有中譯)*
□參考材料
1.Lefebvre, Henri(1993)〈空間:社會產物與使用價值〉(王志弘譯),收於夏鑄九、王志弘編譯《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》(pp. 19-30),台北:明文書局。(原文出版於1979年)
2.Harvey, David (1994)〈時空之間:關於地理學想像的省思〉(王志弘譯),收於夏鑄九、王志弘編譯《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》(頁47-79),台北︰明文書局。)
3.趙建雄(1992)〈馬克思與恩格斯對城市的研究〉,《地理學報》15: 127-146。
4.Sayer, Andrew (1995) Radical Political Economy: A Critique. Oxford: Blackwell.

第二講 馬克思主義城市理論概說(一) 9/24
□研讀材料
1.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “Karl Marx: commodities and cities, with sober senses,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 13-29). London: Routledge. *
2.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “Frederick Engels: backstreet boy in Manchester,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 31-48). London: Routledge. *
3.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “Walter Benjamin: the city of profane illumination,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 49-69). London: Routledge. *
4.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “Henri Lefebvre: the urban revolution,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 71-92). London: Routledge. *
□參考材料
1.Katznelson, Ira (1992) Marxism and the City. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2.Merifield, Andy (2002) Dialectical Urbanism: Social Struggles in the Capitalist City. New York: Monthly Review Press.
3.Harloe, Michael (ed.) (1977) Captive Cities: Studies in the Political Economy of Cities and Regions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4.Dear, Michael and Allen J. Scott (eds.) (1981) Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society. London: Methuen.
5.Gottdiener, Mark (1985) The Social Production of Urban Space. Austin: University of Texas Press.
6.Logan, John R. and Harvey L. Molotch (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California press.
7.Smith, Michael Peter (1988) City, State, and Market: The Political Economy of Urban Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8.Tabb, William K. and Larry Sawers (eds.) (1984) Marxism and the Metropolis: New Perspectives in Urban Political Economy (2nd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
9.陳東昇(1995)《金權城市:地方派系、財團與台北都會發展的社會學分析》,台北:巨流。
10.陳映芳等(2009)《都市大開發:空間生產的政治社會學》,上海:上海古籍出版社。
11.郭恩慈(2011)《東亞城市空間生產:探索東京、上海、香港的城市文化》,台北:田園城市。

第三講 馬克思主義城市理論概說(二) 10/1
□研讀材料
1.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “Guy Debord: the city of Marx and Coca-cola,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 93-111). London: Routledge. *
2.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “Manuel Castells: the city of Althusser and social movements,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 113-132). London: Routledge. *
3.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “David Harvey: the geopolitics of urbanization,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 133-155). London: Routledge. *
4.Merrifield, Andy (2002) “Marshall Berman: a Marxist urban romance,” in Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City (pp. 157-173). London: Routledge. *

第四講 Henri Lefebvre:空間生產與都市革命 10/8
□研讀材料
1.Lefebvre (1991) “Contradictory space”, in The Production of Space (pp. 292-351). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.*
2.Lefebvre, Henri (2003) The Urban Revolution (trans. by Robert Bononno). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.【選讀】*
□參考材料
1.Lefebvre, Henri (1976) The Survival of Capitalism: Reproduction of the Relations of Production. New York: St. Martin's Press. (Original work published 1973).
2.Lefebvre, Henri (1968) Dialectical Materialism. London: Jonathan Cape. (Original work published 1939).
3.Lefebvre, Henri (1984) Everyday Life in the Modern World. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
4.Lefebvre, Henri (1991a) The Production of Space.(trans. by Donald Nicholson-Smith). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1974).
5.Lefebvre, Henri (1991b) Critique of Everyday Life. (three volumes). London: Verso.
6.Lefebvre, Henri (1995) Introduction to Modernity. London: Verso.
7.Lefebvre, Henri (1996) Writings on Cities (translated by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas). Oxford: Blackwell.
8.Lefebvre, Henri (2003) The Urban Revolution (trans. by Robert Bononno). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.Lefebvre, Henri (2004) Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. London: Continuum.
10.Lefebvre, Henri (2008)《空間與政治》(李春譯)。上海:上海人民出版社。
11.Shields, R. (1999) Lefebvre, Love & Struggle: Spatial Dialectics, London: Routledge.
12.Elden, Stuart (2004) Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the Possible. London: Continuum.
13.Merrifield, A. (2006) Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction, New York: Routledge.
14.Goonewardena, K., Kipfer, S., Milgrom, R. and Schmid, C. (eds.)(2008) Space, Difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.
15.Stanek, Lukasz (2011) Henri Lefebvre on Space: Architecture, Urban Research, and the Production of Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.Butler, Chris (2012) Henri Lefebvre: Spatial Politics, Everyday Life, and the Right to the City. New York: Routledge.
17.張孝夷(2014)《列斐福爾空間批判理論研究》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。

第五講 David Harvey:批判性閱讀 10/15
□研讀材料
1.Zukin, Sharon (2006) “David Harvey on cities,” in Noel Castree and Derek Gregory (eds), David Harvey: A Critical Reader (pp. 102-120). Malden, MA: Blackwell. *
2.Sheppard, Eric (2006) “David Harvey and dialectical space-time,” in Noel Castree and Derek Gregory (eds), David Harvey: A Critical Reader (pp. 121-141). Malden, MA: Blackwell. *
3.Bob, Jessop (2006) “Spatial fixes, temporal fixes and spatial-temporal fixes”, in Noel Castree and Derek Gregory (eds), David Harvey: A Critical Reader (pp. 142-166). Malden, MA: Blackwell. *
4.Braun, Bruce (2006) “Towards a new earth and a new humanity: nature, ontology, politics”, in Noel Castree and Derek Gregory (eds), David Harvey: A Critical Reader (pp. 191-222). Malden, MA: Blackwell. *
□參考材料
1.Harvey, David (1982) The Limits to Capital. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2.Harvey, David (1985a) Consciousness and the Urban Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
3.Harvey, David (1985b) The Urbanization of Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
4.Harvey, David (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
5.Harvey, David(2008)《新自由主義化的空間》(王志弘譯)。台北:群學。
6.Harvey, David (2010)《資本的空間》(王志弘、王玥民譯)。台北:群學。
7.Schoenberger, Erica (2004) “The spatial fix revisited”, Antipode 36(3): 427-433.*
8.Sheppard, Eric (2004) “The spatiality of The Limits to Capital”, Antipode 36(3): 470-479.*
9. Paterson, John L. (1984) David Harvey's Geography. London: Croom Helm.

第六講 David Harvey:寰宇主義與自由地理 10/22
□研讀材料
1.Harvey, David (2014)《寰宇主義與自由地理》(王志弘、徐苔玲譯)。新北市:群學。【選讀】
(原文:Harvey, David (2009) Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom (pp. 17-36). New York: Columbia University Press.*)

第七講 Doreen Massey:空間分工�社會結構與生產地理 10/29
□研讀材料
1.Massey, Doreen (1984/1995) “Social relations and spatial organization”, in Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (2nd ed.)(pp. 12-64). London: Macmillan.
2.Massey, Doreen (1984/1995) “Uneven development and spatial structures”, in Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (2nd ed.)(pp. 65-120). London: Macmillan.
3.Massey, Doreen (1984/1995) “Class, politics and the geography of employment”, in Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (2nd ed.)(pp. 226-286). London: Macmillan.
4.Massey, Doreen (1984/1995) “Reflections on debates over a decade”, in Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (2nd ed.)(pp. 296-354). London: Macmillan.
(中譯本:Massey, Doreen (2010)《勞動的空間分工:社會結構與生產地理學》(良光嚴譯)。北京:北京師範大學出版社。)
□參考材料
1.Cooke, Philip (ed.) (1989) Localities. London: Unwin Hyman.
2.Clark, Gordon L., Maryann P. Feldman, and Meric S. Gertler (eds) (2003) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(有北京商務印書館中譯本:《牛津經濟地理學手冊》(2005))
3.Sheppard, Eric and Trevor J. Barnes (eds) (2003) A Companion to Economic Geography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.(有北京商務印書館中譯本:《經濟地理學指南》(2008))
4.Barnes, Trevor J., Jamie Peck, Eric Sheppard, and Adam Tickell (eds) (2004) Reading Economic Geography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.(有北京商務印書館中譯本:《經濟地理學讀本》(2007))
5.Corbridge, Stuart, Ron Martin, and Nigel Thrift (eds.) (1994) Money, Power and Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
6.Leyshon, Andrew and Nigel Thrift (1997) Money/Space: Geographies of Monetary Transformation. London: Routledge.
7.Hughes, Alex and Suzanne Reimer (eds) (2004) Geographies of Commodity Chains. London: Routledge.
8.Coe, Neil M., Philip F. Kelly and Henry W.C. Yeung (2007) Economic Geography: A Contemporary Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.(有北京商務印書館中譯:《當代經濟地理學導論》(2012))
9.楊友仁(2004)〈經濟地理學的制度轉向:一個理論性回顧與研究取向的建議〉,《國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》,12: 69-80。

第八講 Doreen Massey的批判性閱讀 11/5
□研讀材料
1.Saldanha, Arun (2013) “Power-geometry as philosophy of space,” in David Featherstone and Joe Painter (eds.), Spatial Politics: Essays For Doreen Massey (pp. 44-55). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
2.dell'Agnese, Elena (2013) “The political challenge of relational territory,” in David Featherstone and Joe Painter (eds.), Spatial Politics: Essays For Doreen Massey (pp. 115-124). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
3.Wills, Jane (2013) “Place and politics,” in David Featherstone and Joe Painter (eds.), Spatial Politics: Essays For Doreen Massey (pp. 135-145). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
4.Haesbaert, Rogério (2013) “A global sense of place and multiterritoriality: notes for dialogue from a "peripheral" point of view,” in David Featherstone and Joe Painter (eds.), Spatial Politics: Essays For Doreen Massey (pp. 146-157). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
5.Cumbers, Andrew and Paul Routledge (2013) “Place, space, and solidarity in global justice networks,” in David Featherstone and Joe Painter (eds.), Spatial Politics: Essays For Doreen Massey (pp. 213-223). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.

第九講 資本主義與勞動地理 11/12
□研讀材料
1. Herod, Andrew (1997) “From a geography of labor to a labor geography: labor’s spatial fix and the geography of capitalism”, Antipode 29(1): 1-31.*
2.Herod, Andrew (2003) “Workers. Space and labor geography”, International Labor and Working-Class History 64: 112-138.*
3.Herod, Andrew (1997) “Labor's spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US east coast longshore industry, 1953–1989.” Political Geography 16(2): 145-169.*
4.Herod, Andrew (1998) “Discourse on the Docks: Containerization and Inter-Union Work Disputes in US Ports, 1955–85.” Trans Inst Br Geogr NS 23: 177-191.*
5.Herod, Andrew (2001) “Labor internationalism and the contradictions of globalization: Or, why the local is sometimes still important in a global economy.” Antipode 33(3): 407-426.*
6.Herod, Andrew, Al Rainnie and Susan McGrath-Champ (2007) “Working space: why incorporating the geographical is central to theorizing work and employment practices.” Work, Employment and Society 21(2): 247-264.*
□參考材料
1.Herod, Andrew (ed.)(1998) Organizing the Landscape: Geographical Perspectives on Labor Unionism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
2.Herod, Andrew (2001) Labor Geographies: Workers and the Landscapes of Capitalism. New York: The Guilford Press.
3.Herod, Andrew (2000) “Implications of just-in-time production for union strategy: Lessons from the 1998 General Motors-United Auto Workers dispute.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(3): 521-547.*
4.Herod, Andrew (1991) “The production of scale in United States labour relation.” Area 23(1): 82-88.*
5.Herod, Andrew (1995) “The practice of international labour solidarity and the geography of the global economy.” Economic Geography 71(4): 341-363.*
6.Castree, Noel, Neil M. Coe, Kevin Ward and Michael Samers (2004) Spaces of Work: Global Capitalism and the Geographies of Labour. London: Sage.*
7.Thrift, Nigel, and Peter Williams (eds.) (1987) Class and Space: The Making of Urban Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.Harvey, David (1989) “Class structure and the theory of residential differentiation”, in The Urban Experience (pp. 109-124). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.Harvey, David (2010)〈階級力量的地理〉,收於《資本的空間》(王志弘、王玥民譯)(pp. 537-572),台北:群學。*
■繳交「空間分析一:空間生產的政經分析」

第十講 國家�空間 11/19
□研讀材料
1.Brenner, Neil, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones and Gordon MacLeod (2003) “Introduction: state space in question”, in Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones and Gordon MacLeod (eds), State/Space: A Reader (pp. 1-26). Malden, MA: Blackwell.*
2.Lefebvre, Henri (2003) “Space and the state”, in Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones and Gordon MacLeod (eds), State/Space: A Reader (pp. 84-100). Malden, MA: Blackwell.(原文出版於1977年)*
3.Brenner, Neil and Stuart Elden (2009) “Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory,” International Political Sociology, 3: 353-377.*
4.Poulantzas, Nicos (2003) “The nation”, in Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones and Gordon MacLeod (eds), State/Space: A Reader (pp. 65-83). Malden, MA: Blackwell.(原文出版於1978年)*
5.Brenner, Neil (2009) “Open questions on state rescaling,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2: 123-139.*
□參考材料
1.Harvey, David (2001) “The Marxian theory of the state”, in Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography (pp. 267-283). New York: Routledge. (First published in Antipode, 1976)
2.Agnew, John, Katharyne Mitchell, and Gerald Toal (eds) (2003) A Companion to Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.Delaney, David (2005) Territory: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.Brenner, Neil (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
■繳交期末報告計畫書

第十一講 (再)尺度化與尺度政治 11/26
□研讀材料
1.McMaster, Robert B. and Eric Sheppard (2004) “Introduction: scale and geographic inquiry”, in Eric Sheppard and Robert B. McMaster (eds), Scale & Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method (pp. 1-22). Malden, MA: Blackwell.*
2.Brenner, Neil (2009) “A thousand leaves: notes on the geographies of uneven spatial development”, in Roger Keil and Rianne Mahon (eds), Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale (pp. 27-49). Vancouver: UBC Press.
3.Miller, Byron (2009) “Is scale a vhaotic concept? Notes on processes of scale production”, in Roger Keil and Rianne Mahon (eds), Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale (pp. 51-66). Vancouver: UBC Press.
4.Kipfer, Stefan (2009) “Why the urban question still matters: reflections on rescaling and the promise of the urban”, in Roger Keil and Rianne Mahon (eds), Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale (pp. 67-83). Vancouver: UBC Press.
5.Jessop, Bob (2009) “Avoiding traps, rescaling states, governing Europe”, in Roger Keil and Rianne Mahon (eds), Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale (pp. 87-104). Vancouver: UBC Press.
6.Swyngedouw, Erik (2009) “Producing nature, scaling environment: water, networks, and territories in Fascist Spain”, in Roger Keil and Rianne Mahon (eds), Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale (pp. 121-139). Vancouver: UBC Press.
□參考材料
1.Herod, Andrew (2011) Scale. London: Routledge.
2.Sheppard, Eric and Robert B. McMaster (eds)(2004) Scale & Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3.Brenner, Neil (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.Smith, Neil (1996) “Spaces of vulnerability: the space of flows and the politics of scale”, Critique of Anthropology 16(1): 63-77.
5.Brenner, Neil (1999) “Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies”, Theory and Society 28(1): 39-78.
6.楊友仁、蘇一志(2002)〈地域競爭與空間政治:台灣南部科學園區的個案分析〉,《地理學報》31: 35-81。*
7.簡博秀、周志龍(2006)〈空間再層域化和國家:改革開放後的中國空間發展策略〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》18(1): 77-118。*
8.林子新(2011)〈找回尺度的階序結構:邁向空間的意識形態政治〉,《地理學報》62: 19-48。*

第十二講 縉紳化(一) 12/3
□研讀材料
1.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (2008) “The birth of gentrification”, in Gentrification (pp. 3-38). New York: London.*
2.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (2008) “Producing gentrification”, in Gentrification (pp. 39-86). New York: London.*
3.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (2008) “consumption explanations”, in Gentrification (pp. 89-126). New York: London.*
□參考材料
1.Smith, Neil and Peter Williams (eds) (1986) Gentrification of the City. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
2.Smith, Neil (1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
3.Ley, David (1996) The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (eds)(2010) The Gentrification Reader. New York: London.
5.Brown-Saracino, Japonica (ed.)(2010) The Gentrification Debates. New York: Routledge.
6.Zukin, Sharon (1982) Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
7.Zukin, Sharon (2010)《權力地景:從底特律到迪士尼世界》(王志弘、王玥民、徐苔玲譯),台北:群學。

第十三講 縉紳化(二) 12/10
□研讀材料
1.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (2008) “The mutation of gentrification”, in Gentrification (pp. 129-161). New York: London.*
2.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (2008) “Contemporary gentrification”, in Gentrification (pp. 163-193). New York: London.*
3.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (2008) “Gentrification: positive or negative?”, in Gentrification (pp. 195-236). New York: London.*
4.Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater and Elvin Wyly (2008) “The future of gentrification?”, in Gentrification (pp. 239-277). New York: London.*

第十四講 新自由主義城市:美國 12/17
□研讀材料
1.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “The place, time, and process of neoliberal urbanism”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 1-14). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.*
2.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “Choosing a neoliberal path”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 15-39). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
3.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “The globalization of governance”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 40-60). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
4.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “The public-private partnership”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 61-76). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
5.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “The neoliberal spatial fix”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 79-97). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
6.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “The reinvested urban core”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 98-122). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
7.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “Neoliberal gentrification”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 123-149). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
8.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “Mega-projects in the urban core”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 150-171). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
9.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “Social struggle in a neoliberal policy landscape”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 175-187). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
10.Hackworth, Jason (2007) “Alternative futures at the end of history”, in The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (pp. 188-204). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. *
□參考材料
1.Harvey, David (2010)〈聯邦丘觀點〉,收於《資本的空間》(王志弘、王玥民譯)(pp. 189-226),台北:群學。
2.Harvey, David (2010)〈從管理主義到企業主義:晚期資本主義都市治理的轉變〉,收於《資本的空間》(王志弘、王玥民譯)(pp. 503-536),台北:群學。
3.Brenner, Neil and Nik Theodore (eds)(2002) Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
4.Leitner, Helga, Jamie Peck and Eric S. Sheppard (eds)(2007) Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers. New York: The Guilford Press.
5.Smith, Adrian, Alison Stenning and Katie Willis (eds)(2008) Social Justice and Neoliberalism: Global Perspectives. London: Zed Books.

第十五講 新自由主義城市:香港與台灣 11/24
□研讀材料
1.藍逸之(2014)《新自由主義下的香港治理:空間、尺度與策略》。台北:政大出版社。
2.藍逸之、李承嘉、林宜璇(2015)〈從擴大租隙解析都市更新條例之新自由主義邏輯:地產博奕或優質再生?〉,《都市與計劃》42(2): 109-152.*
3周素卿、吳幸玲、江尚書(2009)〈後工業化臺北與新自由主義都市政治〉,《中國地理學會會刊》43:15-32。*
4.張容瑛(2014)〈臺北都會區港口城市的困局:再生中的基隆?〉,《地理學報》72: 5-29.*
5.藍逸之、李承嘉(2015)〈作為制度舒緩的三生農業臺灣農地新自由化、調節過程與農業體制再結構〉,《地理學報》76: 25-68。*
□參考材料
1.藍逸之(2013)〈一個新自由城市、兩種都市政權?1997後香港都市治理的空間爭議〉,《城市學學刊》4(1): 87-139。*
2.周志龍、陳台智(2014)〈新自由主義都市開發策略的多尺度治理挑戰-大臺北新都會的案例分析〉,《地理學報》72: 31-55.*
■繳交「空間分析二:空間政治與鬥爭」

第十六講 金融化與地產導向式發展 12/31
□研讀材料
1.French, Shaun, Andrew Leyshon and Thomas Wainwright (2011) “Financializing space, spacing financialization.” Progress in Human Geography 35(6): 798-819.*
2.Smart, Alan, James Lee (2003) “Financialization and the role of real estate in Hong Kong's regime of accumulation.” Economic Geography 79(2): 153-171.*
3.Weber, Rachel (2010) “Selling city futures: the financialization of urban redevelopment policy.” Economic Geography 86(3): 251-274.*
4. Klink, Jeroen, Rosana Denaldi (2014) “On financialization and state spatial fixes in Brazil. A geographical and historical interpretation of the housing program My House My Life.” Habitat International 44: 220-226.*
5.Fields, Desiree (2014) “Contesting the financialization of urban space: community organizations and the struggle to preserve affordable rental housing in New York City.” Journal of Urban Affairs 37(2): 144-165.*
6.楊友仁(2013)〈金融化、城市规划与双向运动:台北版都市更新的冲突探析〉,《国际城市规划》28(4): 27-36。*
□參考材料
1.Pike, Andy and Jane Pollard (2010) “Economic Geographies of Financialization.” Economic Geography 86(1): 29-51.*
2.Hal, Sarah (2011) “Geographies of money and finance II: Financialization and financial subjects.” Progress in Human Geography 36(3): 403-411.*
3.Lapavitsas, Costas (2013) “The financialization of capitalism: ‘Profiting without producing.” City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action 17(6): 792-805.*
4.Rolnik, Raquel (2013) “Late neoliberalism: The financialization of homeownership and housing rights.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(3): 1058-66.*
5.Kaika, Maria and Luca Ruggiero (2013) “Land financialization as a ‘lived’ process: The transformation of Milan’s Bicocca by Pirelli.” European Urban and Regional Studies, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413484166.*
6.Walks, Alan (2013) “From financialization to sociospatial polarization of the city: Evidence from Canada.” Economic Geography 90(1):33-66.*
7.Guironnet, Antoine, Katia Attuyer and Ludovic Halbert (2015) “Building cities on financial assets: The financialisation of property markets and its implications for city governments in the Paris city-region.” Urban Studies, pp.1–23. DOI: 10.1177/0042098015576474.*

第十七講 空間抗爭.城市權.空間正義 1/7
□研讀材料
1.Martin, Deborah and Byron Miller (2003) “Space and contentious politics.” Mobilization: An International Journal 8(2): 143-156.*
2.Helga Leitner, Eric Sheppard and Kristin M. Sziarto (2008) “The spatialities of contentious politics.” Trans Inst Br Geogr NS 33: 157-172.*
3.Harvey, David (2010)〈戰鬥性的地方主義與全球雄心:雷蒙.威廉斯著作中地方、空間與環境之概念政治〉,收於《資本的空間》(王志弘、王玥民譯)(pp. 227-273),台北:群學。
4.Harvey, David (2008) “The right to the city”, New Left Review 53: 23-40. *
5.Marcuse, Peter (2012) “Whose right(s) to what city?” in Neil Brenner, Peter Marcuse, and Margit Mayer (eds.), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City (pp. 24-41). London: Routledge.*
6.Mayer, Margit (2012) “The ‘right to the city’ in urban social movements,” in Neil Brenner, Peter Marcuse, and Margit Mayer (eds.), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City (pp. 63-85). London: Routledge.*
7.Goonewardena, Kanishka (2012) “Space and revolution in theory and practice: eight theses,” in Neil Brenner, Peter Marcuse, and Margit Mayer (eds.), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City (pp. 86-101). London: Routledge.*
□參考材料
1.Harvey, David (2010)〈城市與正義:城市裡的社會運動〉,收於《資本的空間》(王志弘、王玥民譯)(pp. 275-303),台北:群學。
2.Smith, David M. (1994) Geography and Social Justice. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.Soja, Edward W. (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.*
4.Marcuse, Peter et al. (eds)(2009) Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
5.Fainstein, Susan S. (2010) The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.Mitchell, Don (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space (pp. 118-160). New York: The Guilford Press.
7.Harvey, David (2012) Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso.
8.Castree, Noel, Paul Chatterton, Nik Heynen, Wendy Larner, and Melissa W. Wright (eds)(2010) The Point is to Change It: Geographies of Hope and Survival in an Age of Crisis. Malden, MA: Jon Wiley & Sons.*
9.Castells, Manuel (1983) The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.Harvey, David (2000) Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
11.Lefebvre, Henri (1991) “From the contradictions of space to differential space”, in The Production of Space (pp. 352-400). Oxford: Blackwell.
12.Hou, Jeffrey (ed.)(2010) Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. London: Routledge.
13.Nicholls, Walter, Byron Miller and Justin Beaumont (eds.) (2013) Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Social Movements. Farnham, Surrey : Ashgate. *
14.Miller, Byron (2000) Geography and Social Movements: Comparing Antinuclear Activism in the Boston Area. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

第十八講 期末發表會 1/14
□ 修課同學發表期末報告。每人準備十五分鐘配合簡報檔的口頭報告
■繳交「期末報告」

 
參考書目
■不熟空間分析的同學,可以先看人文地理學的入門書:
Cloke, Paul, Philip Crang, and Mark Goodwin (eds.)(2006)《人文地理概論》(王志弘等譯),台北:巨流。
並參看:《空間的社會分析講義》的政治經濟學部分(城鄉所圖書室可借閱)。

■教材與參考書:請參見各週閱讀進度。 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
空間分析一 
15% 
空間生產的政經分析:針對台灣或東亞的實際案例,以空間生產的政治經濟過程,或是促成空間生成與變化的結構性政治和經濟力量為分析主題,撰寫約三千字評論,佔15%。 
2. 
空間分析二 
15% 
空間政治與鬥爭:針對某個台灣或東亞的實際案例,以空間政治與鬥爭為分析主題,撰寫約三千字評論,佔15%。 
3. 
期末報告 
30% 
以空間的政治經濟學分析為取向及主題的學術論文一篇,必須以經驗材料為基礎,運用本課程提到的概念來協助分析。該經驗現象可以位於台灣或其他國家,也可以是歷史材料。該項作業的具體題目,必須事先與教師商議,並撰寫一份期末報告計畫書,說明問題意識、相關文獻和研究方法等(約三頁)。期末報告題目可以是「空間分析」期中作業題目的延伸。期末報告的規格和排版必須符合學術要求,可參照《台灣社會研究季刊》或《台灣社會學》的格式。完稿必須包含中英文題目、中文摘要和關鍵詞等項目;字數以一萬五千字為度。期末報告佔25%,期末報告計畫書佔5%,合計30%。 
4. 
平時表現 
40% 
含出席狀況5%、參與討論10%、口頭報告和書面摘要表現25%等,合計佔40 %。 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/17  課程介紹:空間的政治經濟分析 
第2週
9/24  馬克思主義城市理論概說(一) 
第3週
10/01  馬克思主義城市理論概說(二) 
第4週
10/08  Henri Lefebvre:空間生產與都市革命 
第5週
10/15  David Harvey:批判性閱讀 
第6週
10/22  David Harvey:寰宇主義與自由地理 
第7週
10/29  Doreen Massey:空間分工�社會結構與生產地理 
第8週
11/05  Doreen Massey的批判性閱讀 
第9週
11/12  資本主義與勞動地理 
第10週
11/19  國家�空間 
第11週
11/26  (再)尺度化與尺度政治 
第12週
12/03  縉紳化(一) 
第13週
12/10  縉紳化(二) 
第14週
12/17  新自由主義城市:美國 
第15週
12/24  新自由主義城市:香港與台灣 
第16週
12/31  金融化與地產導向式發展 
第17週
1/07  空間抗爭.城市權.空間正義 
第18週
1/14  期末發表會